Skip to main content
MoZhu MOZHU
← Back to cases

George Washington

George Washington

Founding President of the United States

1732-02-22(Wakefield, Virginia (11 February 1731, Julian calendar))~ 1799-12-14
Born in Wakefield, Virginia

Three-Pillar ChartBirth hour unknown — three pillars only

Year Pillar

壬子

Element Water · Water

NaYin Mulberry Wood

Ten Gods Direct Resource

Month Pillar

壬寅

Element Water · Wood

NaYin Gold Foil Metal

Ten Gods Direct Resource

Day Pillar

乙酉

Element Wood · Metal

NaYin Spring Water

Ten Gods Day Master

Hour Pillar

??

Hour unknown

Not cast

Day Master

乙Wood

Element distribution (three-pillar count)

Water 3, Wood 2, Metal 1, Fire 0, Earth 0

Chart computed by the MoZhu engine (lunar-javascript); without the hour pillar, luck pillars and yearly cycles can't fully unfold.

Case Review

Original writing · hindsight review · anchored in known history, viewed through chart structure

Yi (乙) Wood is the Wood of flowers and grasses, signifying pliant resilience, with Direct Resource revealed in both year and month and Water strong three times over. Looking back on the life of Washington, “Father of His Country”: a War of Independence in which the weak defeated the strong, and his stepping down after two terms without clinging to power, mirror the resilience of Yi Wood and the moral appeal of Direct Resource. Water generates Wood, and French assistance can be seen as “gaining Water.”

Metal prunes Wood (You 酉 Metal); his refusal of a crown and establishment of a republican precedent is a footnote to the pruning of Metal, and that very “pruning” became the core of his greatness. His retirement to Mount Vernon in later years can be observed in hindsight through the structure of “Wood nourished by Water, withdrawing once the work is done.”

This is a cross-cultural comparative retrospective, not an assertion.

Birth date source:English Wikipedia: “George Washington”(cross-checked with public records; bio is an original summary)

This case is for traditional-culture study only, not a judgment of any historical figure; schools of interpretation differ, and these conclusions claim no exclusive truth.