Skip to main content
MoZhu MOZHU
← Back to cases

Cai Yuanpei

Cai Yuanpei

Modern Educator · President of Peking University

1868-01-11(6th year of the Tongzhi reign (Qing), 12th lunar month, day 17)~ 1940-03-05
Born in Shaoxing, Zhejiang

Three-Pillar ChartBirth hour unknown — three pillars only

Year Pillar

丁卯

Element Fire · Wood

NaYin Furnace Fire

Ten Gods Rob Wealth

Month Pillar

癸丑

Element Water · Earth

NaYin Mulberry Wood

Ten Gods Direct Officer

Day Pillar

丙申

Element Fire · Metal

NaYin Foot-of-Mountain Fire

Ten Gods Day Master

Hour Pillar

??

Hour unknown

Not cast

Day Master

丙Fire

Element distribution (three-pillar count)

Fire 2, Wood 1, Earth 1, Metal 1, Water 1

Chart computed by the MoZhu engine (lunar-javascript); without the hour pillar, luck pillars and yearly cycles can't fully unfold.

Case Review

Original writing · hindsight review · anchored in known history, viewed through chart structure

Bing (丙) Fire is the Fire of the sun, signifying openness and integrity, with Rob Wealth and Direct Officer revealed in the year and month, and all Five Phases present. Looking back on the life of Cai Yuanpei as president of Peking University: his guiding principle of “inclusiveness and freedom of thought” mirrors Bing Fire’s “shining on all alike.” Direct Officer signifies educational institution-building, as seen in faculty self-governance and his proposal to “replace religion with aesthetic education.”

Rob Wealth signifies his tireless mediation during the May Fourth upheavals. All Five Phases are present (Fire 2, Wood 1, Earth 1, Metal 1, Water 1); his non-partisan reconciliation of factions and his later journeys to Europe can be given a retrospective footnote through the structure of “the Five Phases flowing freely, embracing all,” which fits his educational philosophy well.

This is a cultural retrospective at the level of three pillars, not a fatalistic judgment.

Birth date source:Chinese Wikipedia: “Cai Yuanpei”(cross-checked with public records; bio is an original summary)

This case is for traditional-culture study only, not a judgment of any historical figure; schools of interpretation differ, and these conclusions claim no exclusive truth.